Attorneys

Related Practices

Massachusetts Considers Severe Limitations on Noncompetes

Client Alert
May 25, 2010

In 2009, two Massachusetts state legislators filed a bill calling for an outright ban of all noncompete agreements in Massachusetts. While that bill died on the vine, the attempted legislative assault on noncompetition agreements continues.   

A bill titled "An Act Relative to Noncompetition Agreements" was recently recommended favorably by the House Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development. If this bill becomes law, it will dramatically change the legal landscape for employment noncompetition agreements. Some of the bill's salient features include:

  • Restricting noncompetes to employees who earn more than $75,000 a year, an amount that would increase by $1,500 each year
  • Limiting agreements to a period of no more than one year, and declaring a six-month restriction "presumptively reasonable"
  • Mandating that employers give candidates advance notice that signing a noncompete agreement will be required as a condition of employment
  • Requiring employers to provide consideration for agreements entered into after employment has commenced  (i.e., continued employment will no longer be sufficient); the bill specifically provides that 10% of the employee's then-compensation is considered "presumptively reasonable" consideration

The bill makes an employer's decision to seek judicial enforcement an inherently risky one. Unless the restriction is presumptively reasonable (e.g., a six-month noncompetition period), the employer must pay the employee's reasonable legal fees in defending an enforcement action if the court either does not enforce a material restriction or it reforms a restriction in a material respect. 

The proposed legislation contains a number of other features that will have a profound impact on when and how employers use and seek to enforce noncompetition agreements in Massachusetts. For example, the bill defines the presumptively reasonable geographic scope of a noncompete as the area in which the employee provided services for the employer. Under existing practice, noncompetes are commonly written to cover the geographic scope of the employer's entire business.

Prince Lobel will closely monitor the progress of this bill, and will provide a timely update should it become law.

If you would like more information about the use or enforcement of noncompetition agreements or other restrictive covenants, please contact Daniel S. Tarlow, the author of this Alert, at 617 456 8013 or dtarlow@PrinceLobel.com

 
100 Cambridge Street, Suite 2200 | Boston, MA 02114 | 617 456 8000